Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder in decreasing in coverage" » "coder and decreasing in coverage" (Expand search), "coder by decreasing in coverage" (Expand search), "coder in increasing in coverage" (Expand search), "coder in decreasing the coverage" (Expand search), "coder in decrease in coverage" (Expand search), "coder in decreasing and coverage" (Expand search), "code in decreasing in coverage" (Expand search), "codes in decreasing in coverage" (Expand search), "poder in decreasing in coverage" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in decreasing in coverage\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in decreasing in coverage ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder in decreasing in coverage") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.