Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder in coding sequence code" » "coder in coding sequences code" (Expand search), "coder in mixing sequence code" (Expand search), "coder in using sequence code" (Expand search), "coder in coding sequence model" (Expand search), "coder in coding sequence encodes" (Expand search), "coder in coding sequence coding" (Expand search), "coder on coding sequence code" (Expand search), "coder in decoding sequence code" (Expand search), "coder non coding sequence code" (Expand search), "code in coding sequence code" (Expand search), "codes in coding sequence code" (Expand search), "poder in coding sequence code" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder in coding sequence code\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder in coding sequence code ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder in coding sequence code") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.