Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implication coder logico programavel" » "code implications coder logico programavel" (Expand search), "model implication coder logico programavel" (Expand search), "power implications coder logico programavel" (Expand search), "coder implications under logico programavel" (Expand search), "coder application code logico programavel" (Expand search), "coder implication pour logico programavel" (Expand search), "coder implication modelo logico programavel" (Expand search), "coder implication order logic programavel" (Expand search), "coder implication order logics programavel" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implication coder logico programavel\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implication coder logico programavel ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implication coder logico programavel") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.