Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder implication analysis example from" » "coder application analysis example from" (Expand search), "coder publication analysis example from" (Expand search), "coder publications analysis example from" (Expand search), "code implications analysis example from" (Expand search), "model implication analysis example from" (Expand search), "power implications analysis example from" (Expand search), "coder implication catalysis examples from" (Expand search), "coder implication analysis enamel from" (Expand search), "coder implication analytical example from" (Expand search), "coder implication analysis example of" (Expand search), "coder implication analysis samples from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder implication analysis example from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder implication analysis example from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder implication analysis example from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.