Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder holding function predicts programming" » "coder holding function devices programming" (Expand search), "coder holding function production programming" (Expand search), "coder holding function mapreduce programming" (Expand search), "coder holding functions predict programming" (Expand search), "coder holding function prediction programming" (Expand search), "coder holding functional predictions programming" (Expand search), "coder unfolding function predicts programming" (Expand search), "coder guiding function predicts programming" (Expand search), "coder hearing function predicts programming" (Expand search), "cancer holding function predicts programming" (Expand search), "cortex holding function predicts programming" (Expand search), "water holding function predicts programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder holding function predicts programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder holding function predicts programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder holding function predicts programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.