Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions using octave programming" » "coder functions using stage programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using objective programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using reactive programming" (Expand search), "power functions using octave programming" (Expand search), "order functions using octave programming" (Expand search), "colour functions using octave programming" (Expand search), "coder function using octave programming" (Expand search), "coder reactions using octave programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using octa programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using octrees programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using oct programming" (Expand search)
"advanced process python python programming" » "advanced access python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced process path python programming" (Expand search), "advanced process paths python programming" (Expand search), "advanced process polyphony python programming" (Expand search), "advanced process pythons python programming" (Expand search), "advanced process piton python programming" (Expand search), "advanced process pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions using octave programming\") OR (\"advanced process python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions using octave programming ) OR ( advanced process python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions using octave programming") OR ("advanced process python python programming"))*.