Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions using inductive programming" » "coder functions using disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using objective programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using reactive programming" (Expand search), "power functions using inductive programming" (Expand search), "order functions using inductive programming" (Expand search), "colour functions using inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder function using inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder reactions using inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using inductively programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using conductive programming" (Expand search), "coder functions using reductive programming" (Expand search)
"advanced in python python programming" » "advanced in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "advanced in piton python programming" (Expand search), "advanced in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "advanced and python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced _ python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced aids python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder functions using inductive programming") OR ("advanced in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions using inductive programming\") OR (\"advanced in python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions using inductive programming ) OR ( advanced in python python programming ))*.