Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions project documentation in" » "coder functions project implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functions art documentation in" (Expand search), "coder functions photo documentation in" (Expand search), "coder foundations project documentation in" (Expand search), "coder elections project documentation in" (Expand search), "coder functions predict documentation in" (Expand search), "coder functions project documentation and" (Expand search), "coder functions project documentation of" (Expand search), "power functions project documentation in" (Expand search), "order functions project documentation in" (Expand search), "colour functions project documentation in" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions project documentation in\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions project documentation in ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions project documentation in") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.