Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions predict coverage in" » "coder function prediction coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functional prediction coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functions media coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functions press coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functions predict adverse in" (Expand search), "power functions predict coverage in" (Expand search), "order functions predict coverage in" (Expand search), "colour functions predict coverage in" (Expand search), "coder functions predict coverage of" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions predict coverage in\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions predict coverage in ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions predict coverage in") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.