Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions predict complex programmers" » "coder functions predict complex programmes" (Expand search), "coder functions predict computer programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions predict computer programmes" (Expand search), "coder function prediction complex programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions public complex programmers" (Expand search), "coder functional prediction complex programmers" (Expand search), "power functions predict complex programmers" (Expand search), "order functions predict complex programmers" (Expand search), "colour functions predict complex programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions predict complete programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions predict couples programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions project complex programmers" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions predict complex programmers\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions predict complex programmers ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions predict complex programmers") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.