Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions in executable process" » "coder functions in executive process" (Expand search), "coder functions in execution process" (Expand search), "coder functions in executable models" (Expand search), "power functions in executable process" (Expand search), "order functions in executable process" (Expand search), "colour functions in executable process" (Expand search), "coder functions into executable process" (Expand search), "coder functions and executable process" (Expand search), "coder functions to executable process" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions in executable process\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions in executable process ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions in executable process") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.