Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions implications on programmer" » "coder function implications on programmer" (Expand search), "coder functional implications on programmer" (Expand search), "coder functions applications on programmer" (Expand search), "power functions implications on programmer" (Expand search), "order functions implications on programmer" (Expand search), "colour functions implications on programmer" (Expand search), "coder functions implications of programmer" (Expand search), "coder functions implications in programmer" (Expand search), "coder functions implications _ programmer" (Expand search), "coder functions implications on programmed" (Expand search), "coder functions implications non programmers" (Expand search), "coder functions implications of programmers" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions implications on programmer\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions implications on programmer ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions implications on programmer") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.