Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functions and object programming" » "coder functions and subject programming" (Expand search), "coder functions and objective programming" (Expand search), "coder functions and content programming" (Expand search), "power functions and object programming" (Expand search), "order functions and object programming" (Expand search), "colour functions and object programming" (Expand search), "coder function and object programming" (Expand search), "coder functional and object programming" (Expand search), "coder functions an object programming" (Expand search)
"based instruction python python programming" » "based instruction method python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction on python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction to python programming" (Expand search), "assisted instruction python python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction pythons python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction piton python programming" (Expand search), "based instruction pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functions and object programming\") OR (\"based instruction python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functions and object programming ) OR ( based instruction python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functions and object programming") OR ("based instruction python python programming"))*.