Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functioning on implementation on" » "models functioning on implementation on" (Expand search), "proper functioning on implementation on" (Expand search), "role functioning on implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functioning an implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functioning and implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functioning _ implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functioning on implementation of" (Expand search), "coder functioning on implementation in" (Expand search), "coder functioning on implementation and" (Expand search), "coder functioning of implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functioning in implementation on" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functioning on implementation on\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functioning on implementation on ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functioning on implementation on") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.