Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functioning on implementation from" » "coder functioning on implementation of" (Expand search), "coder functioning on implementation on" (Expand search), "coder functioning on implementation and" (Expand search), "models functioning on implementation from" (Expand search), "proper functioning on implementation from" (Expand search), "role functioning on implementation from" (Expand search), "coder functioning an implementation from" (Expand search), "coder functioning and implementation from" (Expand search), "coder functioning _ implementation from" (Expand search), "coder functioning of implementation from" (Expand search), "coder functioning in implementation from" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functioning on implementation from\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functioning on implementation from ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functioning on implementation from") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.