Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functionally efficient detection process" » "coder functional coefficient detection process" (Expand search), "coder functional coefficients detection process" (Expand search), "coder functional efficiency detection process" (Expand search), "copper functionally efficient detection process" (Expand search), "become functionally efficient detection process" (Expand search), "filter functionally efficient detection process" (Expand search), "coder functionally efficient selection process" (Expand search), "coder functionally efficient reflection process" (Expand search), "coder functionally efficient protection process" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functionally efficient detection process\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functionally efficient detection process ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functionally efficient detection process") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.