Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder functional annotation in programmers" » "coder functional integration in programmers" (Expand search), "coder functional evaluation in programmers" (Expand search), "modern functional annotation in programmers" (Expand search), "border functional annotation in programmers" (Expand search), "order functional annotation in programmers" (Expand search), "coder functional annotation in programmes" (Expand search), "coder functional annotation non programmers" (Expand search), "coder functional annotation and programmers" (Expand search), "coder functional annotation of programmers" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder functional annotation in programmers\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder functional annotation in programmers ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder functional annotation in programmers") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.