Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function using conducting programming" » "coder function using computing programming" (Expand search), "coder function using inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder function using constraint programming" (Expand search), "coder function using conductive programming" (Expand search), "coder function in conducting programming" (Expand search), "coder function using superconducting programming" (Expand search), "modern function using conducting programming" (Expand search), "power function using conducting programming" (Expand search), "over function using conducting programming" (Expand search), "coder function during conducting programming" (Expand search), "coder reaction using conducting programming" (Expand search)
"advanced with python python programming" » "advances with python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced weight python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced water python python programming" (Expand search), "advanced with pythons python programming" (Expand search), "advanced with piton python programming" (Expand search), "advanced with pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function using conducting programming\") OR (\"advanced with python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function using conducting programming ) OR ( advanced with python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function using conducting programming") OR ("advanced with python python programming"))*.