Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function placement allocation problem" » "coder function placement locations problem" (Expand search), "coder function management allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder function placement adoption problem" (Expand search), "coder station placement allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder function improvement allocation problem" (Expand search), "coder function placement location problem" (Expand search), "modern function placement allocation problem" (Expand search), "power function placement allocation problem" (Expand search), "over function placement allocation problem" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder function placement allocation problem") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function placement allocation problem\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function placement allocation problem ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.