Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder function function redescription model" » "coder function function description model" (Expand search), "coder function functional description model" (Expand search), "coder function reflection redescription model" (Expand search), "coder function function redescription of" (Expand search), "coder function function redescription and" (Expand search), "coder function functional redescription model" (Expand search), "coder function dysfunction redescription model" (Expand search), "coder junction functional redescription model" (Expand search), "modern function function redescription model" (Expand search), "power function function redescription model" (Expand search), "over function function redescription model" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder function function redescription model\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder function function redescription model ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder function function redescription model") OR ("using coding python python programming"))*.