Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder feeding human algorithm parallelization" » "coder feeding human automatic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder feeding human algorithmic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder feeding neumann algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder feeding an algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "powder feeding human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "under feeding human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "worker feeding human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder decoding human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder bonding human algorithm parallelization" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder feeding human algorithm parallelization\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder feeding human algorithm parallelization ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder feeding human algorithm parallelization") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.