Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder error coding functional improvements" » "coder error coding functional improvement" (Expand search), "coder error coding function improvement" (Expand search), "coder error coding functional movements" (Expand search), "coder error coating functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder error coding fractional improvements" (Expand search), "coder error adding functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder error modeling functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder vector coding functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder color coding functional improvements" (Expand search), "code error coding functional improvements" (Expand search), "codes error coding functional improvements" (Expand search), "model error coding functional improvements" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder error coding functional improvements\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder error coding functional improvements ) OR ( on python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder error coding functional improvements") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.