Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder detection in parallel programing" » "coder detection in parallel programming" (Expand search), "coder detection in parallel programs" (Expand search), "coder detection in parallel processing" (Expand search), "code detection in parallel programing" (Expand search), "border detection in parallel programing" (Expand search), "corner detection in parallel programing" (Expand search), "coder detection and parallel programing" (Expand search), "coder detection _ parallel programing" (Expand search), "coder detection of parallel programing" (Expand search)
"using coding python python programming" » "using codigo python python programming" (Expand search), "using codigos python python programming" (Expand search), "using using python python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pythons python programming" (Expand search), "using coding piton python programming" (Expand search), "using coding pitons python programming" (Expand search), "using coping python python programming" (Expand search), "using coating python python programming" (Expand search), "using cooking python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder detection in parallel programing") OR ("using coding python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder detection in parallel programing\") OR (\"using coding python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder detection in parallel programing ) OR ( using coding python python programming ))*.