Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder decoder using logarithmic functions" » "coder decoder using logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder decoder in logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder using algorithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoder and logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "encoder decoder using logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder disorder using logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder decoding using logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder cover using logarithmic functions" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder decoder using logarithmic functions\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder decoder using logarithmic functions ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder decoder using logarithmic functions") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.