Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder deciding on algorithmic curation" » "coder deciding on algorithmic mediation" (Expand search), "coder deciding on algorithm creation" (Expand search), "coder deciding on algorithmic information" (Expand search), "coder deciding of algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coder deciding an algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coder deciding and algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coder depending on algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "poder deciding on algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "codes deciding on algorithmic curation" (Expand search), "coded deciding on algorithmic curation" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder deciding on algorithmic curation") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder deciding on algorithmic curation\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder deciding on algorithmic curation ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))*.