Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding using net sampling" » "modern coding using net sampling" (Expand search), "color coding using net sampling" (Expand search), "odor coding using net sampling" (Expand search), "coder loading using net sampling" (Expand search), "coder modeling using net sampling" (Expand search), "coder drying using net sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using nets sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using set sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using test sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using next sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using nest sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using new sampling" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using net sampling\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using net sampling ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using net sampling") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.