Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding using bare sampling" » "coder coding using based sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using re sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using core sampling" (Expand search), "modern coding using bare sampling" (Expand search), "color coding using bare sampling" (Expand search), "odor coding using bare sampling" (Expand search), "coder loading using bare sampling" (Expand search), "coder modeling using bare sampling" (Expand search), "coder drying using bare sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using bac sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using bert sampling" (Expand search), "coder coding using bags sampling" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding using bare sampling\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding using bare sampling ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding using bare sampling") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.