Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding functions predicts programmers" » "coder coding functions products programme" (Expand search), "coder coding functions predict programmers" (Expand search), "coder coding function predicts programmers" (Expand search), "coder coding functions predicted programmers" (Expand search), "coder scoring functions predicts programmers" (Expand search), "coder voting functions predicts programmers" (Expand search), "coder coping function predicts programmers" (Expand search), "modern coding functions predicts programmers" (Expand search), "color coding functions predicts programmers" (Expand search), "odor coding functions predicts programmers" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding functions predicts programmers\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding functions predicts programmers ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding functions predicts programmers") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.