Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding discourse dependent reprogramming" » "coder coding discourse dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding discourse independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding discourse movement reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coding discursive dependence reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coding dismutase dependente reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder loving discourse dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder founding discourse dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder crossing discourse dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "modern coding discourse dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "color coding discourse dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "odor coding discourse dependent reprogramming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding discourse dependent reprogramming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding discourse dependent reprogramming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding discourse dependent reprogramming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.