Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding detection shell script" » "coder doping detection shell script" (Expand search), "coder fading detection shell script" (Expand search), "coder flooding detection shell script" (Expand search), "coder coding detection skill script" (Expand search), "coder coding detection sec script" (Expand search), "coder coding detection sgtl script" (Expand search), "modern coding detection shell script" (Expand search), "color coding detection shell script" (Expand search), "odor coding detection shell script" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding detection shell script\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding detection shell script ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding detection shell script") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.