Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding dependent test coverage" » "coder becoming dependent test coverage" (Expand search), "coder sliding dependent test coverage" (Expand search), "coder smoking dependent test coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding independent test coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent trust coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent tsp coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent forest coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent root coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding dependent test coverage" (Expand search), "color coding dependent test coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding dependent test coverage" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding dependent test coverage\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding dependent test coverage ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding dependent test coverage") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.