Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding decisions when progressed" » "coder voting decisions when progressed" (Expand search), "coder binding decisions when progressed" (Expand search), "coder hedging decisions when progressed" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions who progressed" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions when processed" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions that progressed" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions in progressed" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions on progressed" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions an progressed" (Expand search), "modern coding decisions when progressed" (Expand search), "color coding decisions when progressed" (Expand search), "odor coding decisions when progressed" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding decisions when progressed\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding decisions when progressed ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding decisions when progressed") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.