Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder work instruction of" » "coder coder work instructions of" (Expand search), "coder coder and instruction of" (Expand search), "coder coder network construction of" (Expand search), "coder coder work instruction on" (Expand search), "coder coder work construction of" (Expand search), "coder coder work instruction _" (Expand search), "coder decoder work instruction of" (Expand search), "code code work instruction of" (Expand search), "decoder codec work instruction of" (Expand search), "coder modern work instruction of" (Expand search), "coder border work instruction of" (Expand search), "coder power work instruction of" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder work instruction of") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder work instruction of\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder work instruction of ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.