Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using sequence repeat" » "coder coder using frequency repeat" (Expand search), "coder coder single sequence repeat" (Expand search), "coder coder mixing sequence repeat" (Expand search), "coder decoder using sequence repeat" (Expand search), "code code using sequence repeat" (Expand search), "decoder codec using sequence repeat" (Expand search), "coder coders using sequence repeat" (Expand search), "coder cover using sequence repeat" (Expand search), "coder code using sequence repeat" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using sequence repeat\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using sequence repeat ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using sequence repeat") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.