Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using frequency structures" » "coder coder using consequence structures" (Expand search), "coder coder using frequency features" (Expand search), "coder coder using frequency studies" (Expand search), "coder coder single frequency structures" (Expand search), "coder coder feeding frequency structures" (Expand search), "coder coder grazing frequency structures" (Expand search), "coder decoder using frequency structures" (Expand search), "code code using frequency structures" (Expand search), "decoder codec using frequency structures" (Expand search), "coder coders using frequency structures" (Expand search), "coder cover using frequency structures" (Expand search), "coder code using frequency structures" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using frequency structures\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using frequency structures ) OR ( via python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using frequency structures") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.