Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder using channel introduction" » "coder coder using change introduction" (Expand search), "coder coder using changes introduction" (Expand search), "coder coder using channel production" (Expand search), "coder coder single channel introduction" (Expand search), "coder decoder using channel introduction" (Expand search), "code code using channel introduction" (Expand search), "decoder codec using channel introduction" (Expand search), "coder coders using channel introduction" (Expand search), "coder cover using channel introduction" (Expand search), "coder code using channel introduction" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder using channel introduction\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder using channel introduction ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder using channel introduction") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.