Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder sampling effect processing" » "coder coder sampling affects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling event processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling object processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling effort processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sampling efforts processing" (Expand search), "coder coder coupling effect processing" (Expand search), "coder under sampling effect processing" (Expand search), "coder over sampling effect processing" (Expand search), "coder core sampling effect processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder sampling effect processing" (Expand search), "code code sampling effect processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec sampling effect processing" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder sampling effect processing") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder sampling effect processing\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder sampling effect processing ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.