Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder going affects processing" » "coder coder going affective processing" (Expand search), "coder coder going affecting processing" (Expand search), "coder coder going fruits processing" (Expand search), "coder coder aging affects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder sorting affects processing" (Expand search), "coder coder logging affects processing" (Expand search), "coder decoder going affects processing" (Expand search), "code code going affects processing" (Expand search), "decoder codec going affects processing" (Expand search), "coder codes going affects processing" (Expand search), "coder coders using affects processing" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder going affects processing\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder going affects processing ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder going affects processing") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.