Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder encoder in detecting" » "coder coder decoder in detecting" (Expand search), "coder modelo encoder in detecting" (Expand search), "coder video encoder in detecting" (Expand search), "coder coder encoder _ detecting" (Expand search), "coder decoder encoder in detecting" (Expand search), "code code encoder in detecting" (Expand search), "decoder codec encoder in detecting" (Expand search), "coder coder encoded in detecting" (Expand search), "coder coder encoder and detecting" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder encoder in detecting\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder encoder in detecting ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder encoder in detecting") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.