Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder developing attention rules" » "coder coder developing action rules" (Expand search), "coder coder developing partition rules" (Expand search), "coder coder developing potential rules" (Expand search), "coder leader developing attention rules" (Expand search), "coder modelo developing attention rules" (Expand search), "coder models developing attention rules" (Expand search), "coder coder developing attention cycles" (Expand search), "coder coder developing attention cases" (Expand search), "coder coder developing attention due" (Expand search), "coder decoder developing attention rules" (Expand search), "code code developing attention rules" (Expand search), "decoder codec developing attention rules" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder developing attention rules") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder developing attention rules\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder developing attention rules ) OR ( api python python python programming ))*.