Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder decoder that predict" » "coder encoder decoder that predict" (Expand search), "coder coder decides that predict" (Expand search), "coder coder decrees that predict" (Expand search), "coder coder decree that predict" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder can predict" (Expand search), "coder coder decoder not predict" (Expand search), "code code decoder that predict" (Expand search), "decoder codec decoder that predict" (Expand search), "codesc poder decoder that predict" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder decoder that predict\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder decoder that predict ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder decoder that predict") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.