Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coverage increases function" » "coder coder coverage increases functional" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage increased functional" (Expand search), "coder coder coverage increase functional" (Expand search), "coder code coverage increases function" (Expand search), "coder cancer coverage increases function" (Expand search), "coder center coverage increases function" (Expand search), "coder decoder coverage increases function" (Expand search), "code code coverage increases function" (Expand search), "decoder codec coverage increases function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coverage increases function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coverage increases function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coverage increases function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.