Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding ts proposed" » "coder modern coding ts proposed" (Expand search), "coder color coding ts proposed" (Expand search), "coder odor coding ts proposed" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding ts proposed" (Expand search), "code code coding ts proposed" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding ts proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder coding is proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder coding to proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder coding s proposed" (Expand search), "coder coder coding its1 proposed" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding ts proposed\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding ts proposed ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding ts proposed") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.