Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding to affect" » "coder modern coding to affect" (Expand search), "coder color coding to affect" (Expand search), "coder odor coding to affect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding to affect" (Expand search), "code code coding to affect" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding to affect" (Expand search), "coder coder acording to affect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding to affect" (Expand search), "coder coder bonding to affect" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding to affect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding to affect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding to affect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.