Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding time reduces" » "coder modern coding time reduces" (Expand search), "coder color coding time reduces" (Expand search), "coder odor coding time reduces" (Expand search), "coder coder coding time reduced" (Expand search), "coder coder coding times reduce" (Expand search), "coder coder coding gene reduces" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding time reduces" (Expand search), "code code coding time reduces" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding time reduces" (Expand search), "coder coder holding time reduces" (Expand search), "coder coder loading time reduces" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the reduces" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding time reduces\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding time reduces ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding time reduces") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.