Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coder coding the affect" » "coder modern coding the affect" (Expand search), "coder color coding the affect" (Expand search), "coder odor coding the affect" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding the affect" (Expand search), "code code coding the affect" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding the affect" (Expand search), "coder coder decoding the affect" (Expand search), "coder coder encoding the affect" (Expand search), "coder coder aiding the affect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the effect" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the affected" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the affective" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding the affect\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding the affect ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding the affect") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.