Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding its1 implication" » "coder coder coding its implication" (Expand search), "coder coder coding its implications" (Expand search), "coder coder coding the implication" (Expand search), "coder modern coding its1 implication" (Expand search), "coder color coding its1 implication" (Expand search), "coder odor coding its1 implication" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding its1 implication" (Expand search), "code code coding its1 implication" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding its1 implication" (Expand search), "coder coder coding is implication" (Expand search), "coder coder coding ts implication" (Expand search), "coder coder coding units implication" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding its1 implication") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding its1 implication\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding its1 implication ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))*.