Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding functions deficits" » "coder coder coding function deficits" (Expand search), "coder coder coding functional deficits" (Expand search), "coder coder coding function deficit" (Expand search), "coder coder scoring functions deficits" (Expand search), "coder coder voting functions deficits" (Expand search), "coder coder coping function deficits" (Expand search), "coder modern coding functions deficits" (Expand search), "coder color coding functions deficits" (Expand search), "coder odor coding functions deficits" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding functions deficits" (Expand search), "code code coding functions deficits" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding functions deficits" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coder coding functions deficits") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding functions deficits\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding functions deficits ) OR ( on python python python programming ))*.