Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder coding dependence function" » "coder coder coding dependent functional" (Expand search), "coder coder coding dependencia funcional" (Expand search), "coder coder coding dependence conditions" (Expand search), "coder coder loading dependence function" (Expand search), "coder coder doping dependence function" (Expand search), "coder coder coding dependent function" (Expand search), "coder modern coding dependence function" (Expand search), "coder color coding dependence function" (Expand search), "coder odor coding dependence function" (Expand search), "coder decoder coding dependence function" (Expand search), "code code coding dependence function" (Expand search), "decoder codec coding dependence function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder coding dependence function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder coding dependence function ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder coding dependence function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.