Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coder applying formal programming" » "coder coder applying foetal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying fetal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying fram programming" (Expand search), "coder coder applying proximal programming" (Expand search), "coder model applying formal programming" (Expand search), "coder after applying formal programming" (Expand search), "coder could applying formal programming" (Expand search), "coder decoder applying formal programming" (Expand search), "code code applying formal programming" (Expand search), "decoder codec applying formal programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coder applying formal programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coder applying formal programming ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coder applying formal programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.